Biorealism Explained

Or Why HBD and Race-Realism Must Retire

Whenever people want to talk about population differences, they either label themselves “race-realists", “HBD” or as engaging in “sex-research”. All of these terms are not general enough to both encompass all objects of discussions while also propose a theory of analysis moving forward. They are case specific, lacking a unifying understanding and are ultimately not prescriptive enough. For this reason they must retire.

In my original video on Right-Wing Progressivism, I covered what a Biorealist analysis looks like in relation to other modes of analysis, yet I did not provide a coherent definition on what it is.

Biorealism at its core holds that the dynamics of human behavior, societal customs, and institutional systems mirror the biological nature and composition of their members. It is a form of materialism arguing that spirit emerges out of matter. To use a computer analogy, culture or any other human output is like software, while the hardware is what generates output. In HBD-autistic friendly terms it can be described as: genotype being primary and phenotype being secondary. We are what our biology has shaped us to be.

Now, it does not allege that the phenotype cannot have an organizing relation with the genotype, for phenotype can engage in assembly-like selection of a genotype on a reproductive as well as gene-editing basis, just as it can engage on it on an epigenetic level. Culture-gene-co-evolution is a perfect example of a phenotype based evolution, yet the phenotype culturally evolves in-line with its genetic predispositions, not in spite of them. For the purposes of an instantaneous pragmatic as opposed to a long-range analysis, genotype can best explain outcomes in organization between different populations stratified by class, sex, race, personality, interest or any other statistically identifiable trait that is proven to be produced as a result of differential genetic selection.

Biorealism As Means of Biological Progress

If we understand Biological Progress (at least in relation to vertical progress) to be a form in which a biological organization overcomes or outcompetes its environment by innovating a new function that in evolutionary terms is referred to as "fitness-enhancing” and keeps it in successive iterations of itself then the most obvious implication becomes to assimilate the innovation across the population (horizontal progress) and assembly the selective pressures for proliferation of further biologically innovative functions (vertical progress), creating a progressive loop.

The immediate implication of such a realization is the formation of a proper grounding theory recognizing this observable truth, one that applies to all levels of population analysis. Such a theory, in turn, will foster the development of a progressive social vision wherein the learned classes begin to advocate for the cultural preference of superior traits within a population, thereby ensuring their propagation in the gene-pool whereas, traits deemed biologically inferior would, by analogous cultural mechanisms, be systematically diminished within the gene pool.

Description → Prescriptive Vision

Thus, in essence, Biorealism practically constitutes the definition of eugenics. Yet, it is not to be enforced through natural or negative selection, but through voluntary and rational selection, or assembly using the now increasingly more predictive complex gene associations analysis known as GWAS as well as other means available to us through proper phenotypical utilization of available technology generated by people with superior genetic abilities.

Biorealism provides foundation for future organizational projects in areas of institutions, conventional morality, selection, medicine, economics and other human constructed realms, whereas racial realism ends at racism or ethnic self-determination and sex research is only used to undermine the gender ideology yet its proponents frequently cannot figure out how race just like sex is too a biological reality. Any other form of population analysis is limited to a populational category, whereas Biorealism leads one to a unified approach to all social matter involving biology and so that is why we must adopt it.

In the last section of this essay, I argue for the best means of how to begin socially utilizing Biorealist knowledge.

What Is To Be Done?