Groypers' March Through The Institutions

Studying The Strategy of Nick Fuentes

In this article I will explain the current Groypers’ strategy for acquiring power, then outline a set of challenges that may prevent them from gaining it. Behind the paywall, I will discuss how to overcome those challenges and successfully infiltrate the institutions.

Recently, Nick Fuentes proposed a detailed strategy of covert infiltrations into the Conservative institutions of America for the purpose of taking power away from the Jewish oligarchy and directing it towards achieving an independent right-wing agenda consistent with America First principles.

The strategy can be summarized as follows:

1. Nick and the Groyper ideology achieving prominence

2. Intelligent Groypers infiltrating the institutions, while concealing their real beliefs

3. Groypers begin using political leverage (both social and institutional) to pressure politicians and institutions to adhere to America First agenda

4. Making effective change

It is certain that, Nick Fuentes has achieved a political prominence. Major news articles are covering him, he appears on numerous high-reach political podcasts and generates very strong and positive audience reception. In the past 40 days, Nick Fuentes had appeared on Patrick Bet David and Tucker Carlson’s show, generating 3-6 million views, or as among the 8th and 4h most watched video on their respective channels.

The likes to dislikes ratio is also very high and so are the comments.

In contrast, Ben Shapiro’s “comeback” has generated just under one million views, only a 46% approval rate and overwhelmingly negative comments, suggesting that the momentum is with Nick Fuentes and the Groypers.

Such a prominence is owed to Nick’s unique charisma and delivery, ideological coherency and a message that appeals tens of millions of people. Above all, Nick Fuentes is perceived as “real” and not a bought off establishment figure like Joe Kent or even worse Ted Cruz (who has had a discrediting appearance on Tucker). All of this combined makes Nick Fuentes resonate with people to a much larger degree than any other political figure in America.

As a result Nick Fuentes and Groyper ideas are now hegemonic among Conservatives under the age of 30 and the top leading independent Conservative media figures such as Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson and of course Nick Fuentes himself. The sole Conservative figure with a large following who seem to not be onboard with the program is Steven Crowder. Finally there’s the Daily Wire with their fence-sitters who seem to be afraid to take a side between Ben Shapiro (literally their boss lol) and Nick Fuentes, whereas just a few years ago they had no problems condemning and trashing Nick Fuentes.

The next step is the infiltration of the institutions that is now taking place. For long the Groypers were labelled as chudcels living in their parents’ basements who have no girlfriends, but according to a New York Times estimate, about 30 to 40 percent of DC GOP staffers under the age of 30 are Groypers, although Nick Fuentes himself believes that this number is higher. What certainly cannot be denied, is that after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Nick Fuentes and his ideas became the most influential right-wing personality for Republicans under the age of 30 and young Republican staffers are certainly influenced by these ideas.

In his livestream, Nick urged his listeners to take a pro-active stance in politics. Get educated, get involved and try to be at the center of everything important without disclosing one’s true beliefs and learn the language of the enemy. This subversion process should be continued until the Groypers become the sole organizing force within the Republican Party.

A big test for this strategy will be the 2028 elections. That will be the Groyper entry into the electoral stage. Given that Groypers are already estimated to be about 7% of American electorate and are quite loyal to Nick Fuentes, the Groypers will have the power to end the career of any potential Republican nominee by boycotting and campaigning against them if they won’t adhere to America First principles.

There certainly are big popular incentives for Republicans (and Democrats) to distance themselves from Israel and such a tactic would definitely resonate with most Republican voters even if it will result in a Republican defeat in the next elections. As I wrote on Twitter in a response to a Jewish Democrat who is now pretending to be a MAGA Republican as he sees the Republican Party is the better alternative for advancing Jewish interests:

This form of a strategy could be best described as a form of a managerial revolution, in which lower and middle management, becomes the sole organizing force of the institution, applying pressures in every direction. Theoretically, it works well, but only as long as those at the top permit it. In the next section, I will outline the adversity Groypers will face on their way in, without repeating Nick’s warnings about hunts and entry barriers within those institutions, because it is already self-evident that the powers that be wouldn’t prefer to share it with a new rising elite that is opposed to their interests.

Money Trumps Management: Why Groyper Infiltration Hits a Donor Wall

While the Groypers are highly psychologically and politically active, more so than Jews are, the main difference between Jews and Groypers is that Groypers are primarily a political force, whereas Jews come from all walks of life, which choose to engage in politics, even though they don’t necessarily come from politics.

This may not appear as a major obstacle at first glance, but we live in a system in which the Jewish oligarch class is determining the political scene in America through the financing movements and organizations that suit their ethnic difference and severely punishing those which are perceived to be harmful to Jewish interests.

The 2024 election cycle is the best case of this. The Jewish oligarchs pulled large sums of money from the Democrats and threw it at Republicans because they rightly perceived them as better for Jewish and Israeli interests.

This went into such absurdities, that for the first time in history, the Jewish oligarchs have sent more money to the Republicans than to the Democrats despite the Jewish voters leaning Democrat in a 2-1 to 4-1 ratio.

Now, these Jewish oligarchs didn’t get rich from politics, they got rich from pursuing business in other spheres like tech, finance, real-estate, retail or even OnlyFans. Institutions are dependent on money and whoever butters their bread, gets to determine the ideology of said institutions and given that Jews have a lot of money, they are very eager to do so.

While the Groypers may be prominent among elite students, White house and GOP staffers, campaign managers and other management roles, they don’t possess enough wealth on their side to pressure the Heritage Foundation and other Conservative institutions to pursue an America First agenda instead of caving in to arrogant Jewish demands, which is why the primary strategy of the Groypers is a form of a managerial revolution, yet such a strategy is unlikely to be spread to the owners of these institutions or the donors to whom these institutions are responsive to.

To give you an example, in 2020 The Washington Post was regarded as a partisan Democrat news source, with only 7% consistent Conservative readers.

But then, it’s owner Jeff Bezos decided that the newspaper is too left-wing and blocked it from endorsing Kamala Harrises, before switching its ideology entirely, commanding that it will no longer run pieces opposing the Libertarian ideology, even though the absolute majority of the staffers, editors, readers and news writers were/are left-wing. Ever since, the opinion pieces became more and more in favor of Republicans and as of October 10th of 2025, the Washington Post became regarded as a Conservative opinion page, at least according to one of its major columnists.

This just further illustrates that owners (and in our case donors) take precedence over management in instances in which the owners are deeply psychologically driven, which is certainly the case with the Jewish community.

We live in managed democracy, where decision making power in centralized around capital and prestigious institutions.

The other big problem for Groypers is that, unlike the Jewish-led neo-conservative movement, they did not yet form an academic defense of their ideology which may prevent its dissipation in the academia, which is another veneer of political power that is necessary for the formulation and the justification of think tanks’ ideology which is then adopted by politicians and institutions.

Speaking of which, over 70% of think tank funding comes from donors with explicit political/policy goals which makes their work partisan and non-scientific as opposed to traditional academic studies.

That is not to say that there wouldn’t be individual academics who will also happen to be Groypers, but it is to say that the ideological framework of the movement will not exist as a cohesive academic doctrine like the neo-Conservative movement has been (not that I agree with it, but its principles are clearly formulated in an academic language, which has convinced the majority of our Conservative elites over 40).

Unfortunately, soft-power doesn’t actually count for much in a managed democracy in which political decisions are made in prestigious institutions, big capital and corrupted politicians bribed by money and groomed in prestigious universities.

Certainly, there is a slow infiltration of these institutions, but there is so far little attempt to acquire finance that would buy off the politicians, as AIPAC and other Jewish organizations have.

For this purpose, I believe that the goal is to shift the system towards a state in which guns and money no longer matter for political decisions. What should matter is intellect and virtues and behind the paywall I will explain how to make the American political system more representative, bypass the donor class and allow the Groypers an easy reign in American institutions.