How Ethnocentric Are Jews?
Measuring Ethnocentrism within Israeli and Diaspora Jews
Since many people have enjoyed my previous Jewish article, I have decided to follow-up with the second episode.
People on the Dissident Right tend to assign insane levels of ethnocentrism to Jews whereas Jewish apologetics like Nathan Cofnas et al. like to point out to extreme intermarriage rates among Secular Jews and the existence of Jewish anti-Zionist activist to further a claim that Jews are not particularly ethnocentric.
This essay will attempt to explore this debate relying on modern statistics.
But first, what is ethnocentrism?
In the book “Race Differences in Ethnocentrism” Edward Dutton uses the definition put forward by an American economist William Sumner that defines ethnocentrism as:
the view of things in which one’s own group is the centre of everything and all others are scaled and rated with reference to it … Each group nourishes its own pride and vanity, boasts itself superior, exalts its own divinities, and looks with contempt on outsiders
However, ethnocentrism has many dimensions, such that you can view yourself as superior to others, but you can also hate other groups without necessarily viewing yourself as superior. You could thus use resentment and be ethnocentric towards the outgroups without necessarily valuing the in-group that much. For this purpose Edward Dutton carves up ethnocentrism into “positive” and “negative”, respectively.
He defines “positive ethnocentrism” as “taking pride in your ethnic group or nation and being prepared to make sacrifices for the good of it,” and “negative ethnocentrism” as “being prejudiced against and hostile to members of other ethnic groups.” Dutton not only contends but shows that individuals and groups can score high in the former while remaining low in the latter. More rigorously framed, these two dimensions of ethnocentrism correspond to distinct pillars of group evolutionary strategy: in-group cooperation versus out-group competition.
Practically speaking, exterminating the Gazans because they are Amalek would indicate negative ethnocentrism whereas donating money to Jewish causes or demanding DEI protections for Jews would then indicate positive ethnocentrism.
In what follows, I will present and assess the evidence bearing on the scope and character of Jewish ethnocentrism.
Direct Evidence for Positive Ethnocentrism:
One can start off by looking at how important is Jewish identity for American Jews.
An overwhelming 76% of Jews consider their Jewish identity to be 'very' or 'somewhat' important in their lives—surpassing Whites, Hispanics, and Asians by a wide margin, and edging out even Blacks, who traditionally rank highest in ethnic attachment. Similarly, nearly 89% of American Jews (2024) express a favorable view of Israelis, while support for Palestinians remains confined to a distinct minority—underscoring a clear and consistent pattern of ethnocentric alignment.
A good predictor of positive ethnocentrism is the observance of Jewish identified practices that are salient.
Interestingly enough it is most highly pronounced among powerful, educated, religious and well-off Jews who are racially pure relative to converts, mischlings and secular Jews. With ethnocentrism it is just the same. Jewish-related activities rise with education and money. In contrast, with White Gentiles it is the reverse. Higher education and income (which are proxies for intelligence) predict lower religiosity.
According to MacDonald, Judaism is defined by an unyielding sense of separateness from Gentiles, even in the absence of significant physical distinction. Jews deliberately enforce cultural and genetic boundaries, promote high levels of endogamy, exert strict behavioral control over their members, and punish dissenters with severity. These practices function as a collective strategy designed to maximize in-group solidarity and suppress individual deviation.
Most of the data comes from the United States, however Jews in other Western countries are more ethnocentric than American Jews. Here is a neat example of what I’m talking about:
Looking at the Canadian sample, Jews appear to place even greater importance on their ethnic identity than Blacks, with 64% of them describing it as 'extremely important' to their sense of self, in comparison to 52% of Blacks and just 5% of Whites.
Worth noting is that American Jews are way more liberal and assimilationist than Jews in other Western communities like in Canada. In contrast, to the Canadian sample, American Jews are moderately less ethnocentric than Canadian Jews and slightly less ethnocentric than US Blacks, assigning immense importance to their ethnicity in just 42% of the cases.
The second line of evidence exploring Jewish positive ethnocentrism is the widespread existence of Jewish funded institutions designed for the benefit of Jews. Be it ADL, AIPAC, the AJC, special law firms created for Jews or even your local community center or a gym that is practicing segregation (for the membership is only given to Jews).
To quote Kevin MacDonald:
Woocher (1986, 25-26) points out that charitable work is a very central aspect of contemporary American Judaism as a “secular religion” and in fact constituted the main force for Jewish unity beginning early in the 20th century. Indeed, in the absence of social controls enforcing within-group charity, voluntary financial contribution to Jewish causes became a defining feature of being a Jew. The obligation to aid other Jews had become “a primary expression of the meaning of Jewishness” (Woocher 1986, 28), the primary means for achieving a Jewish identity, for recognizing someone as a Jew, and for maintaining group cohesion in the face of powerful assimilatory pressures.
And again:
The acceptance of mutual responsibility and within-group charity (tzedakah) are basic tenets of Judaism as a civil religion and are central to the perceived moral nature of Judaism. As in traditional Judaism (see Chapter 6), charity is conceptualized primarily as directed within the group. Thus, Woocher (1986, 104 A People That Shall Dwell Alone 125) finds that 51 percent of a group of American Jews in Jewish leadership development programs agreed that providing social and welfare services for Jews was a high priority, and only 2 percent viewed it as a low priority. However, only 4 percent agreed that providing social and welfare services for anyone in need was a high priority, compared to 70 percent who viewed it as a low priority.
Donations are a good proxy for ethnocentrism and so the allocation of these causes can measure the degree of ethnocentrism. For instance, Jews who have experienced antisemitism are 10 times more likely to donate to a charity compared to Jews who have not. This is consistent with the early finding that among the most ethnocentric Jewish cohort, Jewish charity is overwhelmingly prioritized over non-Jewish charity. But even among a less ethnocentric Jewish cohort, the highest average donation is always Israel-related, which occupies around a quarter of all Jewish donations and is by far the largest recipient of Jewish American charity with those with a very strong Jewish identity giving it roughly 50% of their total charity contribution. At the same time, American Jews give more to non-Jewish causes than Jewish ones overall. But this does not control for political donations which may advance Jewish interests.
For instance, while American Jews are traditionally a Democratic voting block in 2024 roughly 1/3 of the top 100 Democratic Jewish campaign donors have switched their allegiances and donated for the Republicans instead of the Democrats after the Democrats were proven to be less reliable on Israel.
To give a better overview of where Jewish-centric donation is most highly concentrated I must quote a Pew Research article:
In the survey (largely completed before the coronavirus pandemic affected daily life across the United States) about half of Jewish Americans say they made a donation to a Jewish cause in the past year. On these measures, too, Jews by religion – and especially Orthodox Jews – are notably more engaged in Jewish communities and causes than are Jews of no religion. For example, 61% of Jews by religion (including 88% of Orthodox Jews) said they made a donation to a Jewish charity in the year prior to taking the survey, compared with about one-in-ten Jews of no religion (11%).
Since truth is discerned through comparison, American Jews seem to exhibit a level of positive ethnocentrism comparable to that of Blacks who donate half of their charitable contributions to explicitly Black causes. On the other hand, Canadian Jews exhibit much higher level of positive ethnocentrism than American Jews in their donations with 80% of their total donations going to Jewish causes, mirroring the Orthodox Jews in the United States.
[Note the very high level of queer donations given to LGBTQ causes as well as the very low level of Asian donations to explicitly Asian causes]
Nepotism and in-group bias:
There is very little data on this, as most of it is anecdotal. If I were to cite the best evidence of a pro-Jewish bias I would point out to their clannish public behavior but a far as I’m aware there is no study looking at this and the topic is poorly researched overall, despite this I managed to dig-up some very high-quality gems.
Second best example is Jewish nepotism which results in better earnings if one is tied to the Jewish community. To quote from a study:
The Conservative Jews serve as the benchmark. When the analysis is performed using denomination raised, Conservative Jews have the highest earnings, but their earnings do not differ significantly from those who say they were raised Orthodox or Reform. Those who report that they were raised “just Jewish” secular, or non-Jewish have significantly lower earnings, with the latter two categories having earnings that are lower by about 40 percent compared to Conservative Jews.
40% is a pretty big jump given that higher religiosity is correlated with a lower IQ and less wealth overall.
It is difficult to explain this away knowing that Atheist Jews must have higher IQs than religious ones, especially ultra-religious like the Haredim, given the very high overrepresentation of secular Jews in power and prominence in comparison to religious Jews.
This of course has real-world effects, and while it is practically impossible to study Jewish networks like the RJC or ADL in a scientific manner, Sean Last provided a great summary to the networking and nepotistic practices of Jews that I will attach here:
Jews with a stronger group identification exhibit a stronger pro-Jewish bias and Jews have a strong group identity overall.
Finally, 71% of American Jews believe that for an “organization to speak for American Jews, it must be almost entirely made up of Jews” which indicates a form of awareness about how their ethnicity is tied to their group interests.
Endogamy:
Jews prioritize marrying other Jews:
Recently there’s been a popular talking point that because secular Jews are marrying-out in 60-70% of the cases this suggests that Jews are not ethnocentric.
I will explore this issue in greater details at a later date. And as I will explain, much of it has to do with the fact that there is not enough Jewish spouses in a predominately non-Jewish countries, coupled with the tendency for children born to these Jewish-Gentile couples to be raised as Jewish, which is in-line with Jewish Evolutionary Strategy, for secular and race-mixing Jews do not represent the core of the Jewish community and so Jewish resources that are most highly concentrated in “the core” will not get a hit, especially considering that the Jewish community as a whole is growing in the United States and by no means is threatened by assimilation.
Nonetheless many Jews do marry out but it is exclusively an American phenomenon, once again confirming the relative “liberal” and “non-tribal” character of American Jews in relation to Israeli and other diaspora Jews.
As can be clearly seen Jewish intermarriage happens only when Jews cannot find a Jewish partner, while in provinces with a strong Jewish demographic such as Quebec and Ontario intermarriage rates for Jews are below 30%.
To further support my point, the Amerindians have the highest intermarriage rates out of all races, despite exhibiting slightly higher positive ethnocentrism than US Blacks. It is difficult to go out of your way to find a partner of your preferred ethnic group, if that ethnic group is not in abundance where you live.
However, when people of the same ethnic group are socialized in the same place and in the same customs, Jewish intermarriage plummets to about 3%. As the articles continues:
That is, controlling for other relevant factors, individuals with more years of education in a Jewish day school are less likely to religiously intermarry than are individuals with fewer years of education in a Jewish day school. And Jewish immigrants from Europe, excluding the former Soviet Union, have a relatively high Jewish intermarriage rate, while Jewish immigrants from Israel and the rest of the North Africa/Middle East region have a relatively low Jewish intermarriage rate.
Finally, while Orthodox and Haredi Jews are perhaps the most ethnocentric people on planet Earth, Liberal American Jews are significantly ethnocentric too.
A study by Dunkel and Ed Dutton measured in-group bias in relation to religiosity and found Jew to be 1st or 2nd most in-group biased religious group.
The Jewish sample was (Jewish Orthodox = 2, Jewish Conservative = 35, Jewish Reform = 47, Jewish Reconstructionist = 4, and Jewish “Other” = 8). In other words it was not skewed by extremely ethnocentric Orthodox or Haredi Jews and consisted mostly of Jewish liberals.
As it became clear, the bias is not a function of religiosity as it is the case with non-Jewish samples. As they discuss:
Using both the full subsample and within each of the religious groups, religiosity was positively associated with in-group favoritism. However, group differences in in-group favoritism were not simply a function of group differences in religiosity. For example, while Baptists had a high level of religiosity and in-group favoritism, Jews had a low level of religiosity yet a high level of in-group favoritism. These findings were not affected by previously established group differences in intelligence and personality.
This lends support to Kevin MacDonald’s thesis of a Jewish evolutionary strategy, wherein ethnocentric behavior emerges organically and does not necessarily depend upon religious belief for its expression (though it does amplify it quite a bit through socialization).
Israel & Dual Loyalty:
Finally our most beloved topic! Israel!
Israel has long been the main focal point for Jewish activism in the diaspora. As Kevin MacDonald explains:
Support for Israel, rather than any set of traditional religious beliefs, has become the litmus test of being a Jew: Elazar (1980) notes that "Israel has become the keystone to the entire Jewish belief system" (p. 92), so that individuals who fail to support Israel's claims are "more or less written off by the Jewish community and certainly are excluded from any significant decision-making role" (p. 91).
This sentiment is very much supported by data anywhere between 88% and 97% of American Jews are generally pro-Israel. As already mentioned, only a minority of American Jews have good views of the Palestinians (not Hamas). 94% of Canadian Jews support the existence of Israel as a Jewish ethnostate and a similar number of Americans.
Diaspora Jews have long cultivated a reputation for their pronounced sensitivity toward the marginalized and oppressed. They played leading roles in the American Civil Rights Movement, were key figures in the dismantling of South African apartheid, and have contributed significantly to a range of causes typically associated with the political left like the Frankfurt School or the Bolsheviks.
TLDR: when there’s a social injustice, call the Jews to fix it!
Yet when it comes to Israel, they seem to be at a confusion and by “they” I mean both liberal, conservative, centrists, reformed Jews, orthodox Jews any practically any other category of Jews.
Nearly 85% of American Jews still believed it was important for the U.S. to support Israel after October 7th—almost a year into the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
There was no meaningful difference between right wing (Republican) and left wing (Democrat) Jews when it comes to their support of Israel:
84% of Jewish Democrats were in support of Israel’s campaign, while 87% of Jewish Republicans said the same
Same with religion:
Among Reform Jews, 85% supported Israel’s military ground operation while 87% of Conservative Jews approved.
Stated differently, no matter what ideology Jews follow, they still are going to support group interests more than principles.
Of course the most remarkable is the fact that over 23 thousand American Jews CURRENTLY SERVE in the IDF as of February 2024, whereas at the peak of the Iraq war, just less than four thousand American Jews have decided to serve for the United States. In fact as the article remarked, “there are more Buddhists in the military, 4400, than there are Jews!”. At that point Buddhist stood at less than 1% of US population, whereas Jews stood at 2.5% (4.5% for people with Jewish ancestry).
Here is more stuff on dual loyalty:
a survey conducted in the late 1970s found that among highly committed Jews, 70 percent agreed or strongly agreed with the statement “I feel more emotional when I hear Hatikvah [the Israeli national anthem] than when I hear the Star Spangled Banner,” while less than 33 percent agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, “The primary loyalty of American Jews must be to the United States and their fellow Americans.
But what about anti-Zionist Jews?
It is true that anti-Zionist Jews are extremely overrepresented in the Israel-Palestine debate. Doesn’t that destroy your point?
Absolutely not because these are edges of the Jewish community. Norman Finkelstein et al. are widely hated by the Jewish community and do not represent the general community as a whole, which supports the Jewish ethno-state, irrespective of its ideology.
Now, it is true that these anti-Zionist Jews exist. But I think this primarily has to do with the fact that they are first and foremost intellectuals who exist in the leftist cultural space. Intellectuals usually value consistency and ideological commitment over ethnic allegiances, and just like any other left-wing intellectuals they feel the pressure to conform to the left wing ideology which anti-Zionism is apart of. The existence of Jewish anti-Zionists demonstrates that these Jews have risen above their collective groups identities to dedicate themselves to an ideological norm. Nothing more.
Young Jews:
The only thing positive I could say is that the sentiment is shifting. The younger generation of Jews is much less ethnocentric than the older generation. For instance in a poll that included not full Jews it was found that:
An even greater percentage of American-Jewish teens, 41.3 percent, agreed with the statement that Israel was "committing genocide" in Gaza. Only 10 percent of Jewish teens living outside the US agreed with that statement.
A majority, 66 percent, said that they sympathise with the Palestinian people as a whole.
Still,
a significant majority of those polled said they had pro-Israel sentiments. Sixty-two percent of American-Jewish teens consider themselves to be Zionists, while 84 percent said they believe Israel has "the right to exist as a Jewish State".
The following poll proves it:
If one were to look at other proxies, younger American Jews (those who identify as Jewish) are also less ethnocentric on other measures. They thus seem to be assimilating into a leftist-college culture space, however they are still closer to a MAGA republican than an average leftist college “progressive” on the question of Israel.
In other words, American Jews are less negatively ethnocentric than their Israeli counterparts, yet they are still pretty positively ethnocentric.
Another white-pilling fact is that, Israeli Jews have more of an attachment to American Jews than the other way around.
Just Jews?
Now, Diaspora Jews are not alone in being hypocrites. This tendency is common among virtually all minority groups. In fact, in this respect, Jews are less ethnocentric than many other minorities in the United States (and the West as a whole), such as Indian-Americans.
Jared Taylor does a great overview of every major minority group in the US doing the exact same thing. Here is one citation:
Mexican-Americans have a weaker American identity than other Hispanics because they are surrounded by compatriots and their country of origin is nearby. When citizens and non-citizens are taken together, 55 percent consider themselves first or only Mexican, 25 percent Latino or Hispanic, and only 18 percent think of themselves first or only as Americans.
In this extent Jews appear to be just as ethnocentric as any other group.
More hypocrisy:
Finally, Jewish support for political parties seems to be primarily interest based as opposed to based in any moral convictions. As Kevin MacDonald argues:
Jewish support for particular political parties changed as a function of their support for particular Jewish issues, particularly in the area of foreign policy toward Turkey in the late 1870s and, after 1880, when Jewish attitudes toward czarist Russia, immigration, and eventually Zionism differed quite markedly from those of other Englishmen.
Similar pattern has been observed with Canadian Jews, who overwhelmingly backed the radically-pro Israel Conservative Party instead of the traditional Liberal Party.
As written by Doomer nationalist in response to Nathan Cofnas
Due to this rebranding on Labour’s part, Jewish support for Labour skyrocketed from 11% to 46% and Jewish support for Conservatives dropped dramatically from 61% to 30%. (Boyd 2024) This is actually higher support for Labour than the national average. The explanation for this is obviously the fact that the threat of antisemitism was no longer, and support for Labour was back on the table. Many Jews in fact admit this is the case. (Both 2024).
The shift of major Jewish donors in the 2024 election that I mentioned prior is another example of this. But fundamentally and perhaps, most ironically is the behavior of many Russian Jews towards the war in Ukraine and the Israel’s “war” in Gaza. According to available data, Jews comprised approximately 25% of those designated as 'foreign agents' or those targeted by the Russian government for holding anti-war, pro-LGBTQ, pro-feminist, pro-separatist, or anti-government views.
Many Russian Jews left Russia for Israel following the invasion of Ukraine, including numerous public figures who cited moral objections to the war. However (and while this is anecdotal because there are no statistics on this at all) every single Russian Jew who fled Russia after 2022 that I am aware of is critical of the Russian invasion of Ukraine while is fully supportive of Israel’s “war” against Gaza.
It even goes into complete absurdities as for instance with Tamara Eidelman who appears to be sympathetic to every people that came in contact with the Russians, including if these people were aligned with Nazis or Islamists has openly admitted that whenever she sees Israel bombing Gaza she experiences a form of satisfactory joy.
Another Russian Jew Andrei Makarevich has even recorded an song supporting the IDF.
Thus, ideological convictions matter less to Jews than perceived threats to Jewish identity collaborating the basic thesis of a Jewish Evolutionary Strategy. The Jews may talk about morality for as long as they’d like, but they’ll never apply the same moral principles to themselves or Israel than they demand of others. Case in point:
PS: I’ve also skipped talking about the Israeli Jews. Because their positive ethnocentrism is so high and self evident in relation to Jews in the diaspora (or frankly any other group in the world) that there is no point in even talking about it altogether. However if you are curious about this I highly recommend you to read any books by Israel Shahak.
Direct Evidence for Negative Ethnocentrism:
As Edward Dutton writes:
Direct evidence of Jewish ethnocentrism (in comparison to that of Germans) can be seen in the behaviour of babies, such behaviour being very likely to be strongly genetic in origin. Developmental psychologists have found unusually intense fear reactions among Israeli infants in response to strangers, while the opposite pattern is found for infants from North Germany. The Israeli infants were much more likely to become ‘inconsolably upset’ in reaction to strangers, whereas the North German infants had relatively minor reactions to strangers. The Israeli babies therefore tended to have an unusual degree of stranger anxiety, while the North German babies were the opposite — findings that fit with the hypothesis that Jews are more (negatively) ethnocentric than Europeans (Sagi et al., 1985).
This phenomenon seems to be driven more by biology than by religious indoctrination, as younger and more genetically diverse Jews tend to exhibit lower levels of ethnocentrism. Moreover, even when controlling for religious affiliation, Jews consistently display higher ethnocentrism than any other European group. That said, religion and culture undeniably play a significant role as well. For instance, while the inception of Israel was followed by the ethnic cleansing of most Palestinians residing in Israel proper, earlier Israel was less ethnocentric then it is presently and I believe this has to do with the rising religiously fundamentalist beliefs in Israel.
Younger generation of Israelis are more ethnocentric, religious and right wing than older generations. We will explore another explanation for Israel’s rising ethnocentrism later. For now, I will be focused on documenting Jewish negative ethnocentrism, first in Israel and then in the diaspora.
Jewish group animosity towards non-Jews is primarily driven by the perception to what extent a given group is antisemitic.
If you look at the media, most of Jewish attacks are directed towards White Nationalists, Muslims and Christian Fundamentalists. In reality Blacks are highly overrepresented in both antisemitic beliefs and attacks yet Jews seem unfaced.
However because perception matches actions, Jews are not targeting Blacks and Hispanics for antisemitism (at least before 2023) and instead focus on the Right and Islam.
For instance Jewish support for Affirmative Action grows after they’ve been told that it will actively hurt White people (On the same question, Black people become less supportive of affirmative action when they were told that it will hurt White people).
In contrast, when Jews were told that Affirmative Action will help White women succeed, most Jews have opposed it.
Similarly, While Jews are broadly well-regarded across nearly every demographic in the United States, their own animosity appears sharply directed at Evangelical Christians. Many Jewish apologetics have attributed it to the fact that Evangelical Christians are a Republican voting block, yet the Mormons who the Jews hate less are even strongly Republican aligned than Evangelical Christians. This pattern suggests that Jewish hostility toward Evangelicals stems less from political opposition and more from concerns over cultural or religious boundary maintenance. A similar dynamic is evident in their antipathy toward Muslims, who, despite being one of the most reliably left-wing voting blocs in the country, are nonetheless met with marked suspicion and resentment due to their support for Palestinian self-determination.
When it comes to groups that Jews are really concerned about, it is primarily Christian Nationalists.
At the same time, I must admit that at least in the United States, Jewish-negative ethnocentrism has declined drastically compared to how it was in the past. Many examples of over the top instances of out-group hostility from Jews that are brought by Kevin MacDonald as an example have occurred a long time ago. Intermarriage rates are increasing and at least on public Jews don’t make as many anti-Christian and anti-White statements as they have done in the 2010s and 2000s and earlier.
It is practically impossible to measure this, but this has been my impression.
Finally, there is a second explanation for the decline in Jewish ethnocentrism in the West and its drastic increase in Israel.
What happens if we gather a bunch of Jews in one place? We get a place that is run in accordance with Jewish law. In other words, we get a place in which Jewish identity and culture are most freely expressed. Unhindered by the need to accommodate or moderate for the sensibilities of outsiders. In such an environment, Jewish preferences become enshrined in law, group solidarity becomes a political organizing principle, and collective memory informs everything from immigration policy to education. The result is not simply a religious homeland, but a civilizational enclave—structured around the preservation and advancement of a particular ethnos.
To quote Kevin MacDonald:
The best strategy for Judaism is to maximize its ethnic, particularistic aspects within the limits of current levels of Jewish power to deal with the consequences of anti-Semitism. In Western societies, such a strategy involves walking a very fine line and being flexibly responsive to changes in external contingencies. In America at least, Jews have shown themselves to be very adept at this process.
As Jews obtain greater power, the movement becomes less cryptic and more assertive in its demands. One need only recall the fear that the great majority of Jews felt with the emergence of the Zionist movement in the early decades of the 20th century—a fear that resulted in a great deal of division within the Jewish community and elaborate attempts at image-management in order to minimize anti-Semitism.
Israel as Israel Shahak explains is the manifestation of unchecked Jewish power that no longer cares about public face, for it is busy maximizing its original utility which is living in accordance to Jewish law.
Good evidence that this is happening is mandatory readings of Torah in secular schools, forbidding marriages between Jews and Gentiles, no services or businesses operating on Sabbath, forceful conscription of every non-Arab citizen and a ton of other practices that make Israel one of the least minority friendly countries in the world and the absolute majority of Jews openly admit that they want to keep it this way.
To quote Israel Shahak:
Anyone who lives in Israel knows how deep and widespread these attitudes of hatred and cruelty to towards all Gentiles are among the majority of Israeli Jews. Normally these attitudes are disguised from the outside world, but since the establishment of the State of Israel, the 1967 war and the rise of Begin, a significant minority of Jews, both in Israel and abroad, have gradually become more open about such matters. In recent years the inhuman precepts according to which servitude is the "natural" lot of Gentiles have been publicly quoted in Israel, even on TV, by Jewish farmers exploiting Arab labor, particularly child labor. Gush Emunim leaders have quoted religious precepts which enjoin Jews to oppress Gentiles, as a justification of the attempted assassination of Palestinian mayors and as divine authority for their own plan to expel all the Arabs from Palestine.
Right until the year 2006 the Jewish state practiced a form of slavery directed against non-Jewish migrant workers called the “kafala” in which non-Jewish migrants become stripped of their documents and get exploited for labor, sexual favors and withstand other abuses. This practice still continues, though not as widespread.
The treatment of non-Jews in Israel is completely atrocious, including Christians. While Arabs and Muslims are the primary victims of Jewish supremacy, Christians are experiencing more and more pogroms with every year, motivating many of them to leave the country, which explains why the Christian population has declined in Israel.
Jews dislike Christians more than any other Muslim country with the exception of Turkey and Pakistan. In contrast the Palestinians like the Christians, which explains why only 2% of Palestinian Christians have left the country because of Islamic extremism.
Finally, let’s talk about Jewish attitudes towards the Palestinians, or as most Jews regard them “Amalek”. Please, take a look at these graphs:
When it comes to their prosecution of “war” just 3% of Jewish Israelis consider forcefully ethnically cleansing the Palestinians out of Gaza to be immoral, while 82% approve, which is consistent with earlier surveys indicating that just 2% of Israeli Jews believed that the “IDF was using too much fire power” in their “war” against Gaza.
Israel's adversaries are often reduced to subhumans, making their genocide a permissible cost in the pursuit of Jewish strategic objectives. In a widely cited survey, 47% of Israeli Jews have openly admitted that they want to kill every single Gazan civilian whereas even before the war a majority of Israeli Jews wanted to expel Israeli Arabs from the country. That is, they wanted to expel citizens of Israel who are of Arab descent.
In contrast, Nazi Germany hid their genocide from the public eye, tried to destroy the evidence and did not openly celebrate their actions. There are many videos on the internet in which you can find Israelis dancing and partying while observing the destruction of Gaza. Here are two small samples:
Israeli outburst of violence seem to be primarily bottom-up, completely chaotic and highly emotional as opposed to a calculated, top-down policy for which the Holocaust was. For instance only 21% of Israeli Jews believe that the government should prosecute Jews for raping non-Jewish POW as a form of torture, days after a large swaths of Israeli civic society have attempted to overthrow their government for not allowing them to rape Palestinian prisoners. Even Nazi Germany, notorious for its unparalleled record of mass murder, offers no clear precedent for something like this. On a certain level, this is even funny.
It is hard to even measure these attitudes in relation to other groups or historical perpetrators of genocides. First we don’t have enough data, second it is difficult to imagine that there are modern people that are as negatively ethnocentric as the Israeli Jews are in their mass. Perhaps the Palestinians before mid 2024?
Because there were no public polls in Nazi-Germany, we can certainly look at the attitude of Russians and Ukrainians towards each other. As it is revealed 76% of Russians are against the usage of nuclear weapons in Ukraine. Among the youngest cohort the number reaches 91%. In a different social polling Ukraine ranked 4th on Russia’s enemy list with only 38% of Russians hating it down from a peak of 53% in 2019. Furthermore, in 2023 48% of Russians said they viewed Ukrainians living in Ukraine positively while only 38% disagreed. Of course, this can be explained by the fact that many Russians view the Ukrainians as part of the Russian nation.
For this reason we must look at the Ukrainian sample, which no longer considers itself as part of the Russian nation. And while the attitude of Ukrainians towards Russians is arguably worse for obvious reasons given the 3 years of a bloody war with Russia. To further support this thesis, 75% of Ukrainians want closed borders with Russia yet just 19% of them are against allowing ethnic Russians as a principle into Ukraine. In other words, the hatred is mostly “civic” and “nation” based, it is not ethnic as in the case with the Israelis.
This is further supported by a 2023 poll in which just 34% of Ukrainians said they dislike all Russian citizens irrespective of reason whereas a clear majority of Ukrainians direct their hatred to specific types of Russians. For instance 26% of them don’t dislike Russians who are against the war, 23% said that their hatred is only directed to those who support the war, while 9% are said that their hatred is only directed towards Putin and his surroundings, with the rest saying “I don’t know” or “I like all Russian citizens equally”. In addition 39% of Ukrainians are okay with personally marrying ethnic Russians. In contrast 97% of all Israeli Jews, including 96% of secular Jews would be uncomfortable with marrying someone who is not Jewish.
Furthermore, despite Israel being 25% non Jewish this also extends to friendships. Just 2% of Jews have a close friend that is not-Jewish. By contrast, only 67% of White Americans have exclusively close White friends—roughly in line with their 60% share of the U.S. population.
TLDR, the Israeli Jews appear to be uniquely feral people with Bronze Age mindset that are armed with modern technology which allows them to cause as much destruction in the region as they possibly could, but you have probably already knew that.
A bigger question is why this is the case. A really dumb argument would be to say it is because of the Holocaust. It is dumb because Diaspora Jews were even more ethnocentric before the Holocaust. Today their ethnocentrism is channeled through media but a thousand years ago they literally traded White slaves with the Muslims and exploited the shit out of the peasants in the Russian Empire. Even in late XIX and early XXth century the wealth difference between a German Jew and German Gentile was 2 times bigger than is the wealth difference between an American Jew and and American Gentile. Finally, the Israelis were less ethnocentric in the 1950s then they are now, so it can’t be the Holocaust.
All of this requires a stronger examination of the appropriate literature which I’d gladly do for you if there will be a demand for this type of content on your end. As I already mentioned I am going to write an article on Jewish intermarriage rates in the US and probably present a reworked model of Jewish Evolutionary Strategy originally described by Kevin MacDonald.
Ideally, this type of stuff should be studied in Universities instead of studying “whiteness” but I digress.