Levels of Philosemitism

Different types of philosemites

I posted this powerful tweet to my X account and I felt like there are a lot of things that could have been said which were missing. So here is a full-length article:

There is a specific human type that never quite gets the scrutiny it deserves. Unlike the antisemite, who has been dissected with forensic obsession since 1945, the philosemite is also has been almost under no scrutiny despite being of the opposite end of the JQ obsession.

Now, I want to be precise here. I am not describing people who simply have Jewish friends, admire Jewish contributions to civilization, or support Israel’s right to exist as a geopolitical position. I am describing a distinct psychological type of people: the non-Jew for whom Jews have become a collective deity that must be worshipped and obeyed. The person whose identity, politics, and moral framework cannot be fully understood without reference to what they think about Jews.

Given that is what people on the far-right and far-left of the political spectrum are reduced too, it is only fair that we scrutinize the psychological profile of people who love Jews more than themselves.

I will start with the “least worst” type before I move into the absolute depths of hell:

The Goy

Level one. The bottom of the hierarchy.

The Goy, as I am using the term here, is not defined by active hostility or active sympathy. He is defined by intellectual vacancy combined with a default political position absorbed from the environment.

This type is typically old and grew up on watching television and has the exact same moral code as Jerry Seinfeld.

He supports Israel not because he has thought about it, or not because he was paid to do it, but because he was raised on Hollywood, which has for decades produced a particular narrative architecture around Jewish identity, World War II, and Israeli statehood. He absorbed it the way a child absorbs anything in the ambient environment: completely and uncritically.

Unlike the Zionist Influencer, he cannot make content about this. He lacks the verbal fluency. This is the type of person that would type “I stand with Israel” in comment section without being able to answer why.

The Goy is despised equally by Jews and antisemites alike. He belongs entirely to neither camp and serves no one’s interests well, including his own. In a different social structure he would be an antisemite, a communist or someone else because at its core the Goy has no personhood. A useful idiot

is what he is.

The Zionist Influencer

The Zionist Influencer loves to tell you that Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, how Zionism is actually a deconolization project, or how Israel protects Christians better than any other Middle Eastern country or how it’s America’s best ally or that the IDF is the world’s most moral army. He will say this in a tone that implies he has just delivered a decisive argument, completely unaware of how many times all of these lines were debunked, one by me ;).

If they are successful at being a goybot, they may even get paid up-to 7,000 dollars month. That is to say a lot of big accounts promoting these one-liners are not even organic and are in-fact a spinning screw of Israel’s informational warfare.

This type typically has very strong opinions about Lebanese Christians and their persecution by Muslims, and is absolutely certain this persecution is not being conducted by Israeli forces, even as the evidence accumulates in real time.

The Zionist Influencer is geopolitically illiterate but extraordinarily productive in the informational warfare. He generates slop content at impressive volume so that low IQ goyim or apolitical people could repeat like mantra.

I would say this type is extremely annoying, but he is annoying because of his stupidity, not because of his moral and psychological inclinations that made him support the position that he does.

What distinguishes him from the Shabbos Goy is that he is performing for an audience. The Shabbos Goy for instance has a genuine psychological relationship with Jewish people and their interests.

The Nietzschean Type:

This type is more sophisticated and, in some ways, more honest than the others about what he actually believes.

The Nietzschean philosemite, usually an HBD researcher, a certain stripe of dissident intellectual, or a Douglas Murray type elevated to punditry, worships Jewish achievement through an explicitly hierarchical lens. He has looked at the data on Ashkenazi IQ, Nobel Prize representation, overrepresentation in finance, law, medicine, academia, and media, and drawn from this a conclusion that Jews are, categorically, a superior people.

The moderate variation of this type typically arrives at the conclusion that whatever is good for Jews is good for civilization because Jews are overachievers and so if Jewish actions may result in the genocide of under-achieving people like Palestinians, or the deaths of low-class American servicemen it must be ignored because they are not as valuable as Jews in the utilitarian sense.

A normal person would accept Jewish achievement as a given but wouldn’t conclude that therefore Jews can do whatever they want, no matter how barbaric or socially harmful their actions are to the rest of the world just like a normal person wouldn’t support Nazi Germany invading the USSR because Nazi Germany was culturally, technologically, economically and IQ-wise superior to the Soviet Union.

However, the Nietzschean archetype is Nietzschean precisely because he doesn’t believe in morality, or rather he believes in morality of the strong. And so it follows that because the Jews are so powerful and successful at this that and the other, their negative side must be completely overlooked if not embraced.

It’s not that these people lack morality, no. These people have a different moral life code, one for the master and the other for the slave. The Jews are the master and everyone else is a slave.

Also, the Nietzschean type has an overlap with a sub-category: the Banania type. People who worship authority and resent those who are not close to power. So they’d make arguments that they’re philosemitic because antisemitism is peasant coded, or low human capital, which actually translates into, “I love people who are powerful and hate those who are being abused by powerful people”. Unlike the former group, these people are not simply supremacists with two different versions of a moral code, they are morally nihilistic.

If the cards were to flip, these people would be among the first to become antisemitic, because at their core they lack a functioning moral compass and instead perceive the world through power vibes.

The Shabbos Goy:

The term, in its original usage, describes a non-Jew hired to perform tasks forbidden to observant Jews on the Sabbath. Switching on lights, operating machinery, things that fall outside the permitted on a holy day. The Shabbos Goy fulfills a function. He is useful.

The modern political Shabbos Goy has internalized this arrangement so deeply that it comes natural to him that the purpose of the Gentiles is to serve Jews and he would get offended when you say “no”.

The Tucker Carlson x Ted Cruz interview probably captured this best, although Ted Cruz did not openly affirm Jewish superiority over non-Jews.

Sometimes, more openly you can observe this phenomenon among Christian fundamentalists of the evangelical variety, those who say that Jews are God’s chosen people but Christians like himself are not.

This is basically a theological form of Jewish supremacy that for some reason, non-Jews adopt and expect others not to bully them in return.

TLDR: A Shabbos Goy wants Jews to run the world and is comfortable with his own exclusion from this arrangement. In-fact he’ll help bring this about.

The Raped Goy:

There actually is a worst position to be in before the ultimate philosemite. And that is the “Raped Goy” position.

Unlike the Shabbos Goy, the Raped Goy receives absolutely nothing in return. In-fact, the Raped Goy represents someone who is getting ritualistically humiliated by Jews and still continues to serve them in one form or another. In other words, he always loses because he loves losing.

The Iranian Monarchists who are actively cheering for Israel and United States to bomb their country, support the ethnic separatists within their country and to make their country a vassal state of Israel are the prime definition of the Raped Goyim. They don’t have self respect and because they don’t have self respect, Jews don’t respect them either.

Unlike The Shabbos Goy, these people are not motivated by theology, they simply enjoy getting literally raped by Jews, whom they regard as superiors.

Also reminds me of this but that is a story for another day:

TLDR: The Raped Goy’s place in the hierarchy is secured precisely by his willingness to subordinate his in-group interests to those of a group he is not a member of and never will be, even when that group destroys his own. Hence, “The Raped Goy”.

The Milei Type:

Finally there is the Milei type, based around Argentine’s goy president. Someone who actually converts to Judaism, moves the embassy, cries at the Wall, wants to be buried in Israel. He loves Jews so much he actually becomes one. It’s a variation of the Raped Goy that eventually becomes the Rapist.

Kassy Akiva (Dillon) is another example of this phenomenon. The Milei Type represents philosemitism taken to its logical conclusion: the erasure of the self into the beloved.

This type feels that Jews are so superior that he wishes to end his own ethnic lineage in favor of the lineage of the winning team (if they even allow him). Not every Goy can become a Jew as the Jews are very strict with who they allow into their caste and so before a Goy ascends into a Jew, he will have to go through endless circles of humiliation and self-erasure and only when he completely gets rid of his heritage he can finally be welcomed into the Jew world.

*************************************************************************************************************

Alright, this are the ones I could think of. Let me know if I missed something. Other people were also giving me ideas but I think that I pretty much combined all of them into six.

Sorry for inactivity, new article will be within 7 days.