In this article, I will shed light on Indian strategy with respect to taking over the West, particularly the United States. Now, there is no concept of an “Indian evolutionary strategy” as far as I’m aware and the topic remains poorly researched. Furthermore, in my writing, I try to be conservative in assessing the Indian threat and generally frame my thesis as: ‘If Indians were to maximize their power or take over a country, here is what they would do”.
In my research on the Indian community, I found them to be less collectivistic and foreign-loyal than the Jews and obviously my theory only covers the behavior of majority of Indians (Hindus in particular) and not all of Indian Americans.
I will start with a brief overview of the Indian community, their power, identity, abilities, and then present what could be described as a strategy for their takeover of the United States or any other Western country.
If we examine the 2020 census, Indian Americans represent about 1.33% of the total US population but comprise roughly 10% of Fortune 500 company CEOs, are responsible for about 10% of total US patents, are 11% of unicorn founders and make-up 25% of Silicon Valley startups and are generally regarded as the group with the highest median income in America, even surpassing Ashkenazi Jews (but not Orthodox Jews).
They are also quite politically influential, both in terms of political donations and in terms of generating political figures. Usha Vance, Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, Kash Patel, Raja Krishnamoorthi, Pramila Jayapal, Kamala Harris and Dinesh D’Souza come to mind immediately, but worry, there will be even more of them. It is certainly hard to quantify how many American politicians are Indian (given there are media influencers, ideologues, influential donors, and deep state apparatchiks), but their overarching presence is certainly felt, and if I were to speculate, they are punching at least four times above their weight.
As of the latest information, there are just 5 Indian congressmen in America (all Democrat btw), but in Canada, where Indians make up a larger share of the population, they already hold 7% of the seats in the House of Commons and 14% of the Cabinet as of 2025 (if you include one Pakistani). Funnily enough, this situation is similar to the number of American Jews who are 2.5-4% (depending on the definition) of the US population but also occupy about 6% of the current government (senate + house of representatives) and not that long ago managed to fill 25% of Biden’s cabinet.
One may already imagine how the Indian presence would increase if Indians constituted a larger share of the US population, as they do in Canada or the UK, a country that has already had a British Indian or Pakistani prime minister.
TLDR to save you some time: Indian Americans are a highly over-privileged and powerful group, which greatly punches about its weight while being just 1.3% of the population.
Indian Identity (India First, America Second)
Now that we have established that Indian-Americans are a highly powerful diaspora, it is important to figure out what to expect of them (much of it will continue behind the paywall).
When it comes to their self-identification, it goes as follows:
Most say they most often describe themselves as either “Indian” (41%) or “Indian American” (21%). Another 10% usually call themselves “American,” 15% call themselves “Asian” or “Asian American,” and 9% say they most often describe their identity as “South Asian.”
Of the country’s six largest Asian origin groups, Indian adults are the most likely to say they typically describe themselves by their ethnicity alone, without the addition of “American.
In other words, roughly half of them don’t even view themselves as American, and just 10% of them could be regarded as “fully assimilated” Americans. In contrast:
About a third (34%) say they most often describe themselves as “Japanese” or “Japanese American.” Another 20% describe themselves most often as “American,” and 39% describe themselves as “Asian” or “Asian American.”
Politically, the generally lean left, but not to the same extent as Ashkenazi Jews, largely due to the amount of Indian moderates and independents. In terms of party loyalty, just 56% of them are Democrats, which is quite low in comparison to Jews. Although as Emil Kierkegaard had pointed out in 2020 and earlier, they were much more liberal.
In the last election, significantly more of them voted for Trump than in the 2020 election, which may be due to the fact that Trump is surrounded by Indians, and, just like Jews, they saw Trump as a man who would act in their interests.
They are also quite tribal in their willingness to support a certain candidate just because of her race like Tulsi Gabbard, although the Chinese are guilty of this too.
Supporting this theory is another poll showing that most Indian Republicans favored the widely unpopular Nikki Haley over Trump—likely because of her Indian background, though without openly admitting it.
Furthermore, just like any other minority group in the US, they are quite hypocritical (well, imagine my shock!). Most Indians, both Democrats and Republicans approve of the Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi, but as we know few of them would approve of White American Christians of enacting the same.
In response to a question asking directly about White supremacy (majoritarianism) in the United States and Hindu “majoritarianism” (supremacy) in India, 70% of Indian Americans believe that White supremacy is a threat, while just 40% of them think the same of their homeland (that’s a Chekhov’s gun, wait for it). More striking, though, is the number of Indian Americans who categorically disagree that White and Hindu majoritarianism is a threat. 32% of Indian Americans strongly disagree that India’s Hindu majoritarianism is a threat, while just 7% of them say the same of White supremacy in the United States.
But wait, there’s more! It turns out “Indian Americans” include Muslims, Christians, non-religious, and “other” groups, so the results we’ve just discussed above are misleading because Muslims and many other minority groups would obviously disapprove of Hindu majoritarianism. If we were to poll only Hindu Indian-Americans, they’d likely be strong advocates for Hinduism and India while also be highly concerned about White and Christian nationalism in the United States.
By the way, here is the religious breakdown of Indian Americans. As you can see about half are Hindus, there is a 15% of Westernized Christians, about 15% secular shitlibs, 11% shitlib-Sikh turbo nationalists/separatists and 8% Muslims.
Thus, they are not as monolithic as the Jews or the Blacks and we should probably try not to lump them all together. The fact that they are not so ethnically diverse explains why they aren’t as loyal to India as the Jews are loyal to Israel.
Although recent Indian immigrants to the United States are more supportive of India’s Hindu nationalist direction. Still, they are far from the Jewish zealous support of Israel.
Another positive thing is that there is no equivalent to AIPAC or other Zionist organizations among Indian Americans, despite Indians possessing the capabilities to organize one.
In contrast, eight out of ten Jewish Americans say that caring about Israel is essential to them being Jewish. Although as I will explain later, Indian dominance strategy doesn’t rely on India for anything other than continuous outflow migration. Indian Americans aren’t necessarily sleeper agents for India; they view America as their final destination that must be transformed in their image, which is why they are so angry and upset with Americans making it harder for them to get into the country.
By the way, America isn’t the only country where Indians prefer to remain rather than return to India. For instance, 80% of Indian prisoners in the UAE would also choose to not relocate to Indian jails. As they explain:
Majority of prisoners preferred to stay back in the UAE due to the better facilities and because they had not revealed about their sentences to people back home.
Indian Ability
Whether an average Indian American IQ is supposedly 101 (unlikely) or around 110 or whether Indian-Indian IQ is 77 or 82 is really besides the point, because Indians have a highly able and well-connected subsection within the Brahmin class that runs India and it’s diaspora abroad.
If you take a population like the English, the Koreans, or the Zulu, their IQ distribution will remind you of a semi-perfect bell curve. With Indians it’s not even remotely close. Each ethnic group has its own average, and each caste within an ethnic group also has its own average, and the castes are as genetically removed from one another as European ethnicities are.
And it’s terrifying.. To quote from a recent study:
some groups within India are as genetically different from each other as Europeans are from East Asians
That is why focusing on India’s average IQ is essentially pointless. A more meaningful approach is to quantify its highly intelligent population, but even that is notoriously difficult to do.
Regardless, I have estimated the number of Indians with above 130 IQ to stand at two and a half million, although my future revision in light of Emil Kirkegaard’s revised estimates placed them significantly under two million. Regardless, the amount of Ashkenazi Jews with that IQ is around one million.
The most reliable way to test the accuracy of my Elite Human Capital (EHC) rankings is to compare them directly with the number of billionaires by country. According to the latest Forbes list, India produces almost exactly as many billionaires as its EHC ranking would predict. In fact, India now ranks third worldwide, just ahead of Germany and Russia—and this position doesn’t even account for the large number of Indians who have amassed wealth in the West. For example the wealthiest British billionaire before his passing was Srichand Parmanand Hinduja and the Hinduja family remains the wealthiest British family to this day.
India’s strong performance points to a talented, highly intelligent subset of its people. Although studies place the Indian average IQ may be between 77 and 82, this group appears to be fully responsible for the country’s success. To give you an example, India ranks as 38th in global innovation index and 32nd in innovation output (sort of like per capita measure but also not), ahead of 96 IQ+ countries like Russia, Slovakia, Poland, Croatia and Latvia. Finally, if you look exclusively at lower middle-income group economies, it takes the first place and is ahead of every other competitors by a long shot, indicating even greater potential. It also ranks as third country in the world for total scientific publications. It is also the fourth country to have landed on the moon and the first country to land on the moon’s south pole. Clearly no other country with an average IQ of about 85 or even 90 comes close.
Nonetheless, the article isn’t about how India will become a super-power or other nonsense. India will always be a shithole country because of its underclass and at least 800–900 million Indians whose innate biology would automatically make them an underclass if they were to magically teleport into, let’s say, Norway. India as a country doesn’t matter at all for my calculation. The only tangible opponent to the US is China. The point that I am trying to make will become available behind the paywall.
How Exactly Will Indians Transform & Take Over America?
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to UBERSOY’s Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.